Greg Witt
Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) Adjudicator Past Decisions
Overview
521
308
75
11
Order OutcomesPRO
Eviction Relief Granted to Tenant 75 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Greg Witt's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Greg Witt typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Lanlord's Notice Found Invalid 11 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Greg Witt's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Greg Witt typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Contested Dispute by CategoryPRO
- Harassment20
Landlord Win Rate: 60%
- Personal Use20
Landlord Win Rate: 80%
- Tenant Agreed Termination19
Landlord Win Rate: 68.42%
- Safety Concerns16
Landlord Win Rate: 56.25%
- Breach Of Conditions10
Landlord Win Rate: 30%
- Property Damage9
Landlord Win Rate: 44.44%
Unlock Full Access to Greg Witt's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Greg Witt typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Orders
The LTB granted an eviction order for non-payment of rent, allowing the tenant until August 31, 2026 to void the order by paying arrears.
The Tenant was ordered to pay rent arrears and application fees to the Landlord, offset by the rent deposit and accumulated deposit interest.
The Landlord and Tenant Board terminated the tenancy following police seizure of cocaine and ammunition in the rental unit, granting a brief postponement of eviction due to the Tenant's bail restrictions.
The Landlord's application to evict the Tenant for substantial interference due to unpaid utilities was dismissed because unpaid utility costs constitute a monetary claim rather than grounds for termination under section 64.
The Landlord's application to terminate a tenancy for non-payment of rent was dismissed because the N4 notices of termination were invalid due to missing certificates of service and inconsistent arrears amounts.
Shi v Topgyal
An LTB order terminates a tenancy and orders eviction due to substantial interference caused by excessive noise, while dismissing damage-related compensation claims.
The LTB granted an eviction order for non-payment of rent, allowing the tenant until August 31, 2026 to void the order by paying arrears.
The Tenant was ordered to pay rent arrears and application fees to the Landlord, offset by the rent deposit and accumulated deposit interest.
The Landlord and Tenant Board terminated the tenancy following police seizure of cocaine and ammunition in the rental unit, granting a brief postponement of eviction due to the Tenant's bail restrictions.
The Landlord's application to evict the Tenant for substantial interference due to unpaid utilities was dismissed because unpaid utility costs constitute a monetary claim rather than grounds for termination under section 64.
The Landlord's application to terminate a tenancy for non-payment of rent was dismissed because the N4 notices of termination were invalid due to missing certificates of service and inconsistent arrears amounts.
Shi v Topgyal
An LTB order terminates a tenancy and orders eviction due to substantial interference caused by excessive noise, while dismissing damage-related compensation claims.
The LTB granted an eviction order for non-payment of rent, allowing the tenant until August 31, 2026 to void the order by paying arrears.
The Tenant was ordered to pay rent arrears and application fees to the Landlord, offset by the rent deposit and accumulated deposit interest.
The Landlord and Tenant Board terminated the tenancy following police seizure of cocaine and ammunition in the rental unit, granting a brief postponement of eviction due to the Tenant's bail restrictions.
The Landlord's application to evict the Tenant for substantial interference due to unpaid utilities was dismissed because unpaid utility costs constitute a monetary claim rather than grounds for termination under section 64.
The Landlord's application to terminate a tenancy for non-payment of rent was dismissed because the N4 notices of termination were invalid due to missing certificates of service and inconsistent arrears amounts.
Shi v Topgyal
An LTB order terminates a tenancy and orders eviction due to substantial interference caused by excessive noise, while dismissing damage-related compensation claims.
The LTB granted an eviction order for non-payment of rent, allowing the tenant until August 31, 2026 to void the order by paying arrears.
The Tenant was ordered to pay rent arrears and application fees to the Landlord, offset by the rent deposit and accumulated deposit interest.
The Landlord and Tenant Board terminated the tenancy following police seizure of cocaine and ammunition in the rental unit, granting a brief postponement of eviction due to the Tenant's bail restrictions.
The Landlord's application to evict the Tenant for substantial interference due to unpaid utilities was dismissed because unpaid utility costs constitute a monetary claim rather than grounds for termination under section 64.
The Landlord's application to terminate a tenancy for non-payment of rent was dismissed because the N4 notices of termination were invalid due to missing certificates of service and inconsistent arrears amounts.
Shi v Topgyal
An LTB order terminates a tenancy and orders eviction due to substantial interference caused by excessive noise, while dismissing damage-related compensation claims.
Unlock Full Access to Greg Witt's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Greg Witt typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions
Mississauga LTB Paralegals: Landlord & Tenant Legal Help in Peel Region (2026)
Find licensed LTB paralegals in Mississauga for eviction, rent arrears, maintenance claims, and tenant defence. Compare Peel Region advocates ranked by real tribunal case records.
Navigating Roommate Disputes: A Legal Guide to Shared Rentals
An in-depth analysis of how the Landlord and Tenant Board handles roommate conflicts, unauthorized occupancy issues, and rent responsibility disputes in shared living arrangements.
Ontario Tenant vs. Landlord at the LTB: Your Complete Complaint Roadmap (2026)
Ontario tenants: learn how to take a landlord complaint from first notice to LTB order — choosing T2 or T6 forms, beating the one-year deadline, drafting your narrative, navigating case conferences, and assembling evidence that tribunals accept.
Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered
Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.
Find Legal Professionals
Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.
Browse ProfessionalsPost Your Legal Needs
Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.
Post a BountyJoin thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform